80 years after Nuremberg, US leads the assault on the ICC — and global accountability
The ICC terminated its contract with French insurer Axa over US sanctions risks — one episode in a systematic Trump administration campaign that has already sanctioned the court's president and judges, and now threatens the very existence of the only permanent tribunal that issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin.
1 / 4What happened
The ICC announced the termination of its agreement with Axa "by mutual consent." The court is moving to a new, unnamed health insurance provider. In a statement, Axa acknowledged that the risks "arise from the extraterritorial application of US sanctions" and that such situations "reflect an increasingly tense and complex international environment for business."
This is not just an insurance dispute. It is a symptom.
The broader context
In February 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order imposing financial and visa sanctions on individuals who assist ICC investigations involving US citizens or allies. The sanctions target judges, prosecutors, and even their family members.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated the goal bluntly: "We will use every tool at our government's disposal to dismantle the ICC, brick by brick, if necessary."
By August 2026, ICC President Tomoko Akane and Judge Abdoulaye Sèye had been added to the sanctions list. According to NPR, Canadian judge Kimberly Prost has had her bank accounts frozen and faces restricted access to financial services. She continues to hear cases, but daily life has become a struggle.
Why this matters for Ukraine and the world
The ICC is the only permanent court capable of prosecuting genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. It issued an arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin. It is investigating Russian atrocities in Ukraine.
If the US succeeds in crippling the ICC, Russia gains a free pass. No international court will be able to hold the Kremlin accountable for the massacres in Bucha, Mariupol, and beyond.
The legal challenge
In July 2026, two US rights groups — Democracy in the Arab World Now (Dawn) and the Taxpayer Alliance Against Genocide (Taag) — filed a lawsuit in federal court in New York, arguing that the sanctions violate the First Amendment. In August, four more organizations, including Human Rights Watch, filed a separate suit.
Omar Shakir of Dawn said: "The sanctions are being used to police the political speech of millions of Americans, forcing groups to avoid coordination with the ICC for fear of fines and prosecution."
What comes next
The Trump administration is reportedly preparing even broader sanctions that could completely paralyze the court. Axa is likely the first of many companies that will sever ties with the ICC to avoid secondary sanctions.
Eighty years after the United States championed the Nuremberg Trials, it is now leading the assault on international law. The question for Kyiv — and for every government that claims to support accountability — is whether they will speak up before the last pillar of global justice collapses.
Primary sources
Documents and statements this story is based on.
- Reuters (via Devdiscourse) — ICC cuts ties with Axa over US sanctions
- BBC — Trump sanctions ICC: US rights groups sue administration
- NPR — What life under U.S. sanctions looks like for one ICC judge
- Just Security — ICC sanctions threat US democracy
- The Guardian — Human rights groups sue Trump administration over ICC sanctions
- Human Rights Watch — Rights Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Targeting ICC
- Amnesty International — What do the Trump administration's sanctions on the ICC mean for justice?
- Al Jazeera — Trump administration readies sweeping sanctions against ICC
- Financial Times — ICC cuts ties with Axa over US sanctions (original)
- Al Jazeera (economy) — ICC ends contract with French insurer amid US sanctions threat